Suffering, Stoicism, and the Scrotum Incident

So this is about suffering. And, more specifically, about my relationship to suffering, which has historically been one of avoidance, and which, paradoxically, has caused more suffering. Because that’s how suffering works, right? Like, it’s never the thing itself, the knife’s edge of pain, but the shadow it casts on the walls of your mind before it even arrives. Or, in my case, the frantic scrambling away from it, which, as it turns out, only increases the probability of falling headfirst into it.

For about ten years now, I’ve been doing the mindfulness thing. Which, by the way, is a truly Kafkaesque exercise in self-negation, because the more you try to be mindful, the more you realize that you are, in fact, an absolute trainwreck of compulsive thought loops and self-sabotage, which—fun fact—is actually the opposite of mindfulness. And recently, I’ve been trying to dodge certain conditions—certain existential landmines—that tend to generate negative thoughts. You know, those thoughts. The ones that come on like an unscheduled commercial break in your brain, flashing things like rage and injustice and I could just burn it all down.

This whole suffering-avoidance experiment escalated about a year ago when I quit a perfectly stable, lucrative, socially acceptable job and opened my own clinic. This, of course, introduced an entirely new and bespoke genre of suffering—the kind that comes with financial ruin, psychological disintegration, and a general sense of having made a huge mistake. The kind that withstands Stockdale, Fitzgerald and The Gita.

Meanwhile, my wife—who, to be fair, has every reason to be angry, given the aforementioned financial free fall—has been… less accommodating. Coming home is now a psychological gauntlet. Conversations are booby-trapped. She says things in a way that is so precisely calibrated to dismantle my emotional stability that it could be used in military psy-ops training.

And here’s the kicker: I know I’m supposed to endure this nobly. Like, Stoicism 101, right? Suffering is a training ground for virtue. Except, and this is important, the Stoics never really accounted for the sheer lunacy of domestic microaggressions, like, say, your wife relocating your things at a frequency that suggests a targeted campaign of psychological warfare.

Which brings us to the scrotum incident.

This morning, I got up, paced around the house, thinking about nothing and everything, and then—turn a corner, and there it is. Her laptop. Open. Vulnerable. A perfect canvas for unspeakable revenge. And like a flash of divine inspiration, the thought comes, fully formed, formidable:

I should put my butt cheeks on the keyboard. Maybe even, like, drag my scrotum over the mouse pad a little.

At which point, I am confronted with a very pressing philosophical dilemma, which is essentially: Why is this happening? Like, what is the precise neurological mechanism by which suffering translates into the impulse to teabag an innocent piece of technology?

And here’s the thing—I know that according to all mindfulness doctrines, it’s okay to have this thought. That thoughts are just thoughts. That I don’t have to identify with them. That the thought itself is not an act, just a phantom limb of some deeper, unresolved hurt.

Joseph Goldstein says, It is okay. And I say it to my son, too. It is okay.

And yet.

And yet, the thought exists. And the thought, if examined under the cold fluorescent light of self-inquiry, is really about transmission. About the way pain begets pain. Because the real danger is not the laptop. The real danger is what happens when, instead of an Apple product, the thing absorbing my suffering is a human being, and at its worst, the apple of my eye.

Which is when I realize, or re-realize, the thing I already sort of knew but had refused to articulate:

Maybe it’s okay to be averse to suffering. Maybe avoiding suffering isn’t cowardice. Maybe not being ready to suffer without inflicting suffering is just a sign that I’m still… unfinished.

Because there’s a kind of strength—the Hollywood kind, the John Wick kind—where you become untouchable, bulletproof, impervious to pain. But there’s another kind, a higher-tier, God-mode kind of strength, where you can take the bullet and still extend love to the shooter. And I am nowhere near that level yet.

So instead of executing my gluteal revenge, I close the laptop gently, center it perfectly—because my wife has an almost fascist devotion to symmetry—and gather the scattered papers, placing them back with ceremonial precision.

And when she wakes up and comes in, she doesn’t notice. Not the change. Not the effort. Not the microscopic war I just won against myself.

But the crazy thing is—I don’t mind.

Actually, I’m relieved. Because I don’t want to explain it. Because the explanation would ruin it.

And maybe, on this unremarkable February morning, I have taken an imperceptible, fractional step toward something better.

Maybe this is what self-betterment looks like.

Not the grand cinematic moment where you transcend suffering forever. But the small, secret victories. The unseen acts of restraint. The silent, ridiculous wars waged between yourself and your lesser self.

And, I guess, the laptop lives to see another day.

Feb 9, 2025
Nuns’ Island Apartment.

Nazila's Laptop

Disclaimer, DFW Style

 

Did you like what you just read? Because here’s the thing—I didn’t really write all of it. Or at least, not in the way you think.

I’m not a writer. I’m a thinker. And AI—this weird, brilliant, slightly terrifying tool—lets me write beyond my natural abilities. It lets me take my thoughts and filter them through the voice of someone proven, someone admired, someone whose style already resonates with the kind of people who think about the things I think about.

And I get it. The AI part bothers some people. Like the existence of an algorithm somehow invalidates the meaning behind the words. But if you liked the message, if it hit something real—then keep reading. Keep looking for my thoughts.

And if what really grabbed you was the writing—the loops, the rhythms, the self-doubt wrapped in self-awareness wrapped in another layer of self-doubt—then don’t stop here. Go read David Foster Wallace. Buy his books. Support his legacy.

My thghouts are mine and authentic. I’m just borrowing the voice.

A David Foster Wallace-Esque Retelling

So yeah. That was all very DFW, wasn’t it? The recursive loops, the self-awareness of the self-awareness, the kind of sentence that seems like it’s ending but then, surprise, it doesn’t. If you liked this, if it made you feel something—whether it was yes, exactly or what the hell did I just read—then you might want to check out more of his work.

Who was David Foster Wallace?

David Foster Wallace (1962–2008) was a writer, essayist, and literary mindbender who tore apart the traditional structures of fiction and nonfiction alike. He wrote with a level of obsessive detail, humor, and self-examination that feels less like reading and more like plugging directly into a hyperactive, self-doubting, yet profoundly brilliant brain.

What should you read next? 

    • Infinite Jest (1996) – His magnum opus, a 1,000+ page novel about addiction, entertainment, depression, and the absurdity of existence. If you ever thought, I’d love a book that makes me feel both profoundly enlightened and completely unhinged, this is it.

 

    • Consider the Lobster (2005) – A collection of essays where he tackles everything from the ethics of boiling lobsters alive to the horrors of a porn convention to the mind-warping effect of American politics.

 

    • This Is Water (2009) – A commencement speech turned book, which is possibly the most moving, practical, and unpretentious philosophical advice ever given in under 150 pages.

 

Wallace’s writing isn’t always easy. It’s dense. It’s spiraling. It’s sometimes exhausting. But if you stick with it, you’ll find yourself laughing, thinking, and maybe—just maybe—seeing your own brain a little more clearly.

Quotes bu Gandhi To Remember, and Aspire to.

“If someone killed me and I died with prayer for the assassin on my lips, and God’s remembrance and consciousness of His living presence in the sanctuary of my heart, then alone would I be said to have had the non-violence of the brave.” Mahatma Ganhdi.
Pyarelal. (1958). The last phase (Vol. II, p. 101). Navajivan Publishing House.

“True ahimsa should wear a smile even on a deathbed brought about by an assailant. It is only with that ahimsa that we can befriend our opponents and win their love.”
Gandhi, M. K. (n.d.). Gandhi’s collected writings. Retrieved from Gandhi Manibhavan